As a businessman in his own right, this should be his strongest subject — but he is not wholly convincing. Mr Sharif offers a long disquisition on how he wants foreign investors, including British companies, to cure Pakistan’s endemic power cuts by building new generating capacity, using the hydro-electric potential of the country’s great rivers.
Yet Pakistan is a place where dodging energy bills is pursued with the same diligence as tax evasion. Less than 0.5 per cent of the population pays any tax; fabulously rich citizens, including politicians, brazenly avoid contributing to the national treasury. British taxpayers, by contrast, will give £446 million to Pakistan as UK aid in 2015.
Fixing tax collection is not a top priority for Mr Sharif. “I have not yet discussed this matter because, you see, these are very initial days,” he says.
“We will have to lower the taxes in the country, the income tax, corporate tax and all the taxes.”
He adds: “There is a lot of leakage in our taxes, it is said that it’s somewhere between 500 and 1,000 billion rupees (£3 billion to £6 billion).”
Some people might be surprised you haven’t discussed this problem more than two months after taking office? “It’s not easy to plug this leakage,” replies the prime minister. “We are in the process of doing that. I think this exercise will take some time. We’ve been just been in office for eight to nine weeks. We are very conscious of this problem,” he says, adding that he is most grateful for British aid.
But Mr Sharif acknowledges that security is essential for economic success. Pakistan’s struggle against radical Islamists, including the Taliban and a host of other extremists, has claimed more lives here than anywhere else in the world. “We are fighting all these elements because look at what they’ve done in different parts of the country,” says Mr Sharif. “More than 40,000 people have lost their lives in this battle against terror.”
His government will produce a new national security strategy in the next “few weeks”, he says, and the emphasis will shift away from force and towards negotiation with the Taliban.
“Of course we’re fighting each other,” he says. “I believe that there may be no harm in exploring the other option of having dialogue with them if they’re at all serious, and if we find them serious enough — and if we think that talks can yield positive results.”
Mr Sharif adds: “Britain had to talk to the IRA and resolve the problem and so to explore this option, I think, is not a bad idea.”
As for Pakistan’s tortured relations with America, he describes the drone campaign on the Afghan frontier as the No 1 “irritant”, adding: “The drones are counter-productive, they are violating our sovereignty and we must respect each other’s territorial sovereignty and if the drones are challenging our sovereignty this is not a fair thing.” Drone strikes might indeed end on Mr Sharif’s watch, if only because America has eliminated almost every target.
The good news is that Mr Sharif is the first prime minister in Pakistan’s history to take over from an elected government that lasted a full term. Today, the country is ruled by democratic politicians according to the constitution, not sinister generals.
If Mr Sharif achieves peace with India and a settlement with the Taliban — two monumental ifs — he could yet be a transforming leader. He seems aware of the burden of responsibility. “I have to make sure we do the right things,” he says. “We have to make sure we tread the right path, pursue the right policies — and not make any mistakes.”
Did he not rob the nation dry?
He gave up Kashmir, with Srinagar in our sight.
He did nothing for the nation.
He comes back on a leash with vested business interests in India. He is not a stateman for Pakistanis but a statesman for the Americans and Indians. He represents American and Indian long term interests, this is not friendship this is bending over for India without India resolving ALL outstanding issue with kashmir as the core.
Musharraf did much wrong:
But he made Pakistan safer.
He reduce Pakistani debt.
He incresed Pakistani GDP.
He made Pakistan stronger.
He has been the closest General to liberating Kashmir.
He did make a pact with USA after 911 but no more than Zardari and Shareef. He was oblivious to the American pervasive nature and tentacles of terror and espionage let loose and to be fair how could he know. neither did Zardari do anything to remvoe American pervasive policies but it was ISI and Pakistan Army that changed this.
Today American is abck in to destabilise Pakistan through Shareef.
Shareef is incapable of governance but master of deceit.
Shareef is a coward and a sham to all punjabis and kashmiris.
Shareef is an utter pillock..
Another 9 civilians die in Azad Kashmir and a woman murdered by Indian blatant targeting of civilians.
Friendship with who?
Latton kay boot baatein say nehin maantay.
History has shown us in 65 years that the Banya nation has only talked peace when it sees Pakistani in a strategic place or assertive.
Pakistan should dismiss any calls for freindship with India and focus on stabilising the nation and borders and provide complete support to Kashmir and WARN India that the continued ceasefire violation from India will result Pakistan full retalliation and we should use China also to give them “the Sino-Pak pinch” – a taste of what it would feel if it became a squeeze.
continued opression of Kashmiris need to be countered with tough talk that Pakistan has the right to cross into Kashmir to assist the Kashmiris as this is a UN ceasefire line of LoC based on India honouring UN resolutions and desisting in it’s persecution of Kashmir.
Why you people mostly concerned about internal matter of India ? Kashmir and even Pok is integral part of India. First of all make your house in order, more Muslim are dying in terrorist attack in Pakistan than India. If you ask to any Muslim they will prefer India than Pak. Considering attack on India. You already tested your power and suffer heavy defeat twice and giving birth to Bangladesh. If you attack again your pakistan will turn into many nation. China is using you to counter India but China will never attack on India considering there economic servile on India. China is not a foolish nation like you. They have more enemy than India and even India have that much guts to defend there sovereignty. Good relation with India is essential for development of Pakistan.
If you can take your new prime minister at his word then he sounds like an experienced individual who has a plan to bring Pakistan forward. He must also know how to deal best with extremists who have plagued your country since its inception.
C’mon mate…. after all this time of this forum…. Do you REALLY think all these “peace loving” Pakis actually want or even understand the concept of peace, negotiations, growth, live and let live etc?
These guys don’t. No wonder they think anyone talking peace with India is doing something wrong. All giggles.
Eddied – you ar enot familiar with Pakistan are you?
Where were extremists inside Pakistan between 1967 – 1999.
There wer none, zero.
The extremist were placed, manufactured to destabilise Pakistan from within in 2001 – 2007 led by the foreign terror group non Pakistani TTP funded and supported by outsiders.
Prior to 1999 where were the extremist?
You are grossly exaggerating your claims or genuinely unfamiliar with the history of Pakistan.
Where were the extremists?…you tell me?…the salafists and the deobrandi were there at that time..why were they not killing kafirs and apostates then?…why were the Sunnis not killing the Shias at that time?…what changed in Pakistanan to make it so intolerant of other ideas?…and please don’t try and tell me the west had anything to do with this intolerance…the west has always believd in tolerance for different religions and beliefs…what changed in Pakistan? Or maybe nothing changed and the killing was happening but no one knew about it?…you tell me?…
Apologies it should read 1947 to 1999.