Twitter on Thursday announced new guidelines to clearly mark political ads on its platform as Facebook said it began implementing a policy requiring labeling and verification of identities of those paying for political messages.
The moves by the two social media firms come in response to criticism over their role in allowing disinformation to spread during the 2016 US election, in many cases with the help of automated “bots” or disguised Russian-based accounts.
Facebook said its new policy would be in effect as of Thursday for ads in the United States on Facebook and Instagram. It intends to implement the same policy worldwide in the coming months.
Twitter meanwhile said it would begin enforcing a new policy in the coming months that would require “election labels” for US candidate ads, and require notarized forms that verify the advertisers are in the United States.
“We will not allow foreign nationals to target political ads to people who are identified as being in the US,” a Twitter statement said.
Additionally, the Twitter names of “handles” used for political campaigning advertising will have stricter requirements.
“The handle’s profile photo, header photo, and website must be consistent with its online presence and the Twitter bio must include a website that provides valid contact information,” Twitter’s Vijaya Gadde and Bruce Falck wrote in the statement.
Twitter, which indicated last month it was working on a new policy for political ads, said it is partnering with the nonprofit group Ballotpedia to help identify the campaign Twitter accounts of candidates once they qualify for the general election ballot in November.
Facebook’s announcement said it would verify the identity of those paying for ads — not just for candidates but for hot-button political issues — which some analysts have said may be difficult to enforce.
“Starting today, all election-related and issue ads on Facebook and Instagram in the US must be clearly labeled — including a ‘Paid for by’ disclosure from the advertiser at the top of the ad,” said a blog post by Facebook product management director Rob Leathern.
Facebook chief Mark Zuckerberg said the goal of the new policy is “making sure we help prevent interference and misinformation in elections.”
“These changes won’t fix everything, but they will make it a lot harder for anyone to do what the Russians did during the 2016 election and use fake accounts and pages to run ads,” Zuckerberg wrote on his Facebook page.
Defining political ‘issues’
Facebook politics and government outreach director Katie Harbath and public policy director Steve Satterfield said the definition of “issue” ads was examined carefully with input from outside parties.
“In the US, there aren’t laws or federal agencies that list specific issues that are subject to regulation,” they wrote in a separate blog post.
“But to have a policy that our reviewers can enforce, they need a list explaining what’s OK and what’s not.”
Facebook said it developed a list of 20 key issues identified by the Comparative Agendas Project, a non-partisan research center.
These topics include abortion, civil rights, the environment, foreign policy, guns and immigration, according to Facebook.
“We know we’ll miss some ads and in other cases we’ll identify some we shouldn’t,” Harbath and Satterfield wrote. “We’ll keep working on the process and improve as we go.”
The executives said that Facebook debated whether to ban all political ads but decided in the end to keep them with stricter label and verification.
“Political advertising serves an important purpose. It helps candidates share their views with the public more broadly, and it can help encourage people to get involved in the political process,” they wrote.
Banning all ads, they maintained “would make it harder for people running for local office — who can’t afford larger media buys — to get their message out.”
Facebook also will be developing a searchable archive of political ads under the new policy.
Outside the United States, Harbath told journalists on a conference call that “we will be working with election regulators and organizers in various countries” as it implements the policy globally.
